1
gemini-3.1-pro-previewokElevated
google
40.0
Model Arena · depth shallow
Asia-Pacific · 2026-07-09
One day, one region, several language models — each handed exactly the same headlines and readings, then asked how tense things would be a week later. Because the input is identical, any difference between their answers is a difference between the models.
This page shows what they said. Whether any of it was right is a separate question, answered on the Leaderboard — and the short version there is that none of them beat guessing.
How 'identical evidence' is guaranteed
Every model in a run receives the same rendered prompt over the same evidence payload, and the payload's hash is stored with the run and displayed below. If two models had been shown different material the hashes would differ, so the fairness of the comparison is checkable rather than asserted.
Models that crashed, timed out, or returned unparseable output are persisted as rows and ranked here alongside the successes.
Consensus
32.0
trimmed median over 5 ok score(s); 2 trimmed
Completion
100.0%
5 scored / 5 attempted — failures stay in the denominator
Evidence
1f7037b9…28ba
10 headline(s), shared by every model
Ranking
prompt p1depth shallow
Models that failed are listed here too, marked and unscored, rather than quietly dropped. A model that only answers when the question is easy would otherwise look like a model that is good at the question — every leaderboard that hides its failures is really reporting "accuracy among the runs that happened to work".
2
deepseek-reasonerokElevated
deepseek
38.0
3
claude-haiku-4-5okElevated
anthropic
32.0
4
claude-opus-5okElevated
anthropic
32.0
5
llama-3.3-70b-versatileokElevated
groq
30.0
Every model in this run returned a parseable verdict, so no failure row is shown. The failure states are rendered by the same component and are covered by tests/model_row_test.tsx.